Welcome to Omgili,
Omgili ( Oh My God I Love It ;) is a search engine for discussions. With Omgili you can find answers and solutions, debates, discussions, personal experiences, opinions and more... To learn more about Omgili click here.
This is a complete preview of the discussion as it was indexed by Omgili crawlers. Use this preview if the original discussion is unavailable.
Click here to view the original discussion.
[http://boards.historychannel.com/thread.jspa?thr...]
Click here to search for discussions with Omgili discussions search engine.
 |
History Channel: Is the Just Department going to ...
We now know who is responsible, is the Justice Department going to investigate this or do we need a Special Prosecutor, due to the obvious conflict of interest?
--
Edited by heathro77 at 03/10/2008 11:46 PM
|
|
|
Let's hope not.
--
|
|
|
Why not?
When are the people who murdered Marilyn Monroe going to be brought to justice?
Justice has been denied too long !
--
Edited by heathro77 at 03/07/2008 7:39 PM
|
|
|
Why are you obsessed with conspiracy theories?
--
|
|
|
Every time you have too people sharing a secret, it's a conspiracy theory.
Bigots abuse the term to keep the truth buried.
What is deragatorily called a conspiracy theory is in fact a hypothesis, and a valid hypothesis is scientific evidence.
|
|
|
I think the Justice Department should investigate how Bush stole two elections, blew up New Orleans, stole billions of dollars worth of oil from Middle East, planned 911 however he wasn't smart enough to "plant" a few WMD's in Iraq
|
|
> I think the Justice Department should investigate how
>
Bush stole two elections, blew up New Orleans, stole
>
Billions of dollars worth of oil from Middle East,
>
Planned 911 however he wasn't smart enough to "plant"
>
A few WMD's in Iraq
Sadly, the Justice Department is too corrupt to investigate Republican wrongdoing.
Even a staunch Conservative like William Buckley Jr., called for the resignation of George Bush jr.
|
|
|
Yeah, but Buckley also was for legalization of mj, which makes him a complete lost cause for other Repubs.
--
|
|
|
So only the GOP is corrupt..
What happened to that 90K in Jefferson's freezer?
How about Sandy Berger?
The last time I time I looked there was a US Senator that drove into the ocean and a woman died.
Need I go on?
|
|
The guy obviously had a brain.
He knew what a waste of money declaring a war on drugs is -a war that cannot be won.
Why waste police resources on a bum who smokes pot?
-the police should have more important crimes to solve.
Solve the murder of Marilyn Monroe.
|
|
> So only the GOP is corrupt..
>
>
What happened to that 90K in Jefferson's freezer?
>
>
How about Sandy Berger?
>
>
The last time I time I looked there was a US Senator
>
That drove into the ocean and a woman died.
>
>
Need I go on?
Be my guest, but study the facts:
History is one big lie, when we fail to expose deception, time has a way of exposing all the factual truths that Richard Nixon thought he had buried.
First and foremost, we need to clearly appreciate the fact that Richard Nixon's greatest shortcoming was not Watergate, but his direct involvement in the domestic, assassination plots of the 1960's.
Indeed, it is a documented, proven fact that Nixon's cronies plotted outright political murder (Jack Anderson was lucky to survive.) He was scheming to have people beaten up.
He associated with mobsters.
Nazi propaganda films were being shown in the White House.
His men schemed to burglarize Republican headquarters and blame it on the Democrats.
They schemed to plant McGovern campaign literature in the apartment of Art Brehmer, the would-be assassin of George Wallace, and the evidence strongly suggests they probably even schemed to assassinate Ted Kennedy, and after having failed, they blamed the fortunate survivor for the death of unintended victim, Mary Jo Kopechne.
Indeed, Nixon's memoirs are littered with evidence that as far as he was concerned, Chappaquiddick was nothing more than an election issue, it had nothing to do with a tragic murder.
To Quote: Richard Nixon directly:
In the short term, I knew that Chappaquiddick would undermine Kennedy's role as a leader of the opposition to the administration's policies.
In the longer term, it would be one of his greatest liabilities if he decided to run for President in 1972.
It was clear that the full story of what had happened that night on Chappaquidick had not come out, [how did he know, did his plan misfire?] and I suspected that the press would not try very hard to uncover it.
Therefore I told Ehrlichman to have someone investigate the case for us and get the real facts out.
[we all know what that means in Nixon-speak.] "Don't let up on this for a minute," I said.
"Just put yourself in their place if something like that happened to us." In fact, our private investigator was unable to turn out anything besides rumors.
Needless to say, the truth was damaging to Richard Nixon, because if it wasn't, he would not have to rely on rumors about Chappaquiddick, for political advantage.
The truth is, Nixon feared another Kennedy candidacy and Chappaquiddick was Richard Nixon's failed attempt to assassinate yet another political rival.
Get the picture?
|
|
|
Nixon resigned 35 years ago in disgrace.
Why didn't Clinton?
I have no problem saying that some GOP members are corrupt.
The issue is you seem to feel the Dem's are clean.
Wake up!
|
|
|
Resign over this?
Get serious.
McCain has had more extramarital affairs than Clinton has, is the Justice Department investigating him for lying about sex?
You know that historians unanimously rejected the plot to force Clinton's resignation, so you should realize that Clinton's resignation would have produced a preposterous precedent.
|
|
> Nixon resigned 35 years ago in disgrace.
>
>
Why didn't Clinton?
>
>
I have no problem saying that some GOP members are
>
Corrupt.
> The issue is you seem to feel the Dem's are clean.
>
>
Wake up!
And don't forget, Nixon resigned to evade criminal prosecution, he never retired.
|
|
|
Bill Clinton was being sued for se*ual harrasment and lied under oath.
It's called perjury and it's a felony.
Unless of course if your a Democrat.
Then anything goes.
Didn't he lose his law license too?
|
|
|
|