Welcome to Omgili,
Omgili ( Oh My God I Love It ;) is a search engine for discussions. With Omgili you can find answers and solutions, debates, discussions, personal experiences, opinions and more... To learn more about Omgili click here.
This is a complete preview of the discussion as it was indexed by Omgili crawlers. Use this preview if the original discussion is unavailable.
Click here to view the original discussion.
[http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=2497...]
Click here to search for discussions with Omgili discussions search engine.
 |
No Abramoff money given to ANY democrats - Christian Forums
Http://www.pastpeak.com/archives/200...crushes_bl.htm
If you look at the article and watch the video, you will see that a few democrats, Byron Dorgan named, took money from Indian tribes, but not from Abramoff.
|
|
S ! It's supposed to be a secret.
The republicans want the general public to believe that the democrats are involved by saying Abramoff and associates.
Some may even tell you that a republican that actually received Abramoff money is a democrat, dont let them fool you
Warning: Watching too much Wolfy may turn your brain to mush.
|
|
|
So much for him being an "equal money distributor", as W claimed.
|
|
Nearly all Senate Democrats took money steered their way by Jack Abramoff, and Hillary Clinton's fundraising committee has agreed to a $35,000 fine.
It's hypoocritical for Democrats to try to use the Abramoff scandal against Republicans.
Sen.
Clinton was under investigation by the Federal Election Commission starting in 2001 for understating in-kind donations.
Last week her New York Senate 2000 fundraising organization conceded the falsity of its campaign filings and agreed to pay the penalty for underreporting donations.
|
|
Originally Posted by Peacebestill Nearly all Senate Democrats took money steered their way by Jack Abramoff This statement is not based in reality.
If it was, I should be able to name a Senate Democrat and you should be able to point me to evidence that they took money that was steered their way by Jack Abramoff.
Could you do that?
(Of course, this is besides the point.
Abramoff is under investigation for giving money and other things of value in exchange for direct action on legislation.
Getting money from lobbyist is not illegal.
Getting money from lobbyists as a bribe is.)
|
|
Originally Posted by Peacebestill Nearly all Senate Democrats took money steered their way by Jack Abramoff, and Hillary Clinton's fundraising committee has agreed to a $35,000 fine.
It's hypoocritical for Democrats to try to use the Abramoff scandal against Republicans.
I love the insinuations.
Money 'steered' their way by Abramoff.
Allegations of this steering are, of course, unsubstantiated.
Sen.
Clinton was under investigation by the Federal Election Commission starting in 2001 for understating in-kind donations.
Last week her New York Senate 2000 fundraising organization conceded the falsity of its campaign filings and agreed to pay the penalty for underreporting donations.
Money paid by Abramoff, of course?
|
|
Originally Posted by notto Originally Posted by peacebestill Nearly all Senate Democrats took money steered their way by Jack Abramoff This statement is not based in reality.
If it was, I should be able to name a Senate Democrat and you should be able to point me to evidence that they took money that was steered their way by Jack Abramoff.
Could you do that?
(Of course, this is besides the point.
Abramoff is under investigation for giving money and other things of value in exchange for direct action on legislation.
Getting money from lobbyist is not illegal.
Getting money from lobbyists as a bribe is.) No, his statement is not based in reality, but based in faith, just like you and I put "faith" in the "liberal media".
|
|
Originally Posted by Peacebestill Nearly all Senate Democrats took money steered their way by Jack Abramoff, and Hillary Clinton's fundraising committee has agreed to a $35,000 fine.
It's hypoocritical for Democrats to try to use the Abramoff scandal against Republicans.
Sen.
Clinton was under investigation by the Federal Election Commission starting in 2001 for understating in-kind donations.
Last week her New York Senate 2000 fundraising organization conceded the falsity of its campaign filings and agreed to pay the penalty for underreporting donations.
...no, Rich Lowry has news for you.
Lowry, a conservative republican ideologue, is coming out against Republicans' efforts to portray the Abramoff scandal as bipartisan.
http://www.nationalreview.com/script...0601100816.asp
The GOP now craves such bipartisan cover in the Jack Abramoff scandal.
Republicans trumpet every Democratic connection to Abramoff in the hope that something resonates.
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.), took more than $60,000 from Abramoff clients!
North Dakota Democratic Sen.
Byron Dorgan used Abramoff's skybox!
It is true that any Washington influence peddler is going to spread cash and favors as widely as possible, and 210 members of Congress have received Abramoff-connected dollars.
But this is, in its essence, a Republican scandal, and any attempt to portray it otherwise is a misdirection.
|
|
|
|