Discussions Search    Reviews    Search Aid    Buzzzz    Google@Omgili    Q&A    Health Add to iGoogle   Bookmark and Share

  Advanced Search

Welcome to Omgili,
Omgili (Oh My God I Love It ;) is a search engine for discussions. With Omgili you can find answers and solutions, debates, discussions, personal experiences, opinions and more... To learn more about Omgili click here.

This is a complete preview of the discussion as it was indexed by Omgili crawlers. Use this preview if the original discussion is unavailable.
Click here to view the original discussion.
[http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index....]

Click here to search for discussions with Omgili discussions search engine.

Benny Morris -- "Nuclear Extermination of 70million Iranians is Kosher"

Quote: Making Nuclear Extermination Respectable By James Petras 31/07/08 "ICH" -- - -On July 18, 2008 The New York Times published an article by Israeli-Jewish historian, Professor Benny Morris, advocating an Israeli nuclear-genocidal attack on Iran with the likelihood of killing 70 million Iranians – 12 times the number of Jewish victims in the Nazi holocaust: “Iran’s leaders would do well to rethink their gamble and suspend their nuclear program.

Barring this, the best they could hope for is that Israel’s conventional air assault will destroy their nuclear facilities.

To be sure, this would mean thousands of Iranian casualties and international humiliation.

But the alternative is an Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland.” Morris is a frequent lecturer and consultant to the Israeli political and military establishment and has unique access to Israeli strategic military planners.

Morris’ advocacy and public support of the massive, brutal expulsion of all Palestinians is on public record.

Yet his genocidal views have not precluded his receiving numerous academic awards.

His writings and views are published in Israel’s leading newspapers and journals.

Morris’ views are not the idle ranting of a marginal psychopath, as witnessed by the recent publication of his latest op-ed article in the New York Times. More... http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20396.htm Shameless!!

Absolutely Shameless.

The Original Article... Quote: Using Bombs to Stave off Warhttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/opinion/18morris.html Quote: Such a situation would confront Israeli leaders with two agonizing, dismal choices.

One is to allow the Iranians to acquire the bomb and hope for the best — meaning a nuclear standoff, with the prospect of mutual assured destruction preventing the Iranians from actually using the weapon.

The other would be to use the Iranian counterstrikes as an excuse to escalate and use the only means available that will actually destroy the Iranian nuclear project: Israel’s own nuclear arsenal. Given the fundamentalist, self-sacrificial mindset of the mullahs who run Iran, Israel knows that deterrence may not work as well as it did with the comparatively rational men who ran the Kremlin and White House during the cold war.

They are likely to use any bomb they build, both because of ideology and because of fear of Israeli nuclear pre-emption.

Thus an Israeli nuclear strike to prevent the Iranians from taking the final steps toward getting the bomb is probable.

The alternative is letting Tehran have its bomb.

In either case, a Middle Eastern nuclear holocaust would be in the cards. Iran’s leaders would do well to rethink their gamble and suspend their nuclear program.

Bar this, the best they could hope for is that Israel’s conventional air assault will destroy their nuclear facilities.

To be sure, this would mean thousands of Iranian casualties and international humiliation.

But the alternative is an Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland.

Some Iranians may believe that this is a worthwhile gamble if the prospect is Israel’s demise.

But most Iranians probably don’t. Preemptive Nuclear War...

Iran is to dangerous to have nukes, so we will nuke you first! Who exactly is the paranoid, nuclear armed terrorist here?

Iran doesn't even have a bomb yet.

Quote: When a Haaretz interviewer called the 1948 Palestinian exodus "ethnic cleansing," Morris responded that "[t]here are circumstances in history that justify ethnic cleansing.

I know that this term is completely negative in the discourse of the 21st century, but when the choice is between ethnic cleansing and genocide—the annihilation of your people—I prefer ethnic cleansing." Meet the man who thinks killing 70million Iranians, (12 times the number that died in the holocaust) is a good idea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benny_Morris

Reaping what you sow, Hell.